Skip to main content

Reflection #3 Standard 3: Assessment and Evaluation


Standard 3 Assessment and Evaluation

Administer and interpret appropriate assessments for students, especially those who struggle with reading and writing.

Analyze and use assessment data to examine the effectiveness of specific intervention practices and students responses to instruction.



       While completing courses in the Reading Specialist Program, many projects, assignments, and student interactions have focused on how to differentiate instruction, find engaging content, learn the theories behind reading instruction, and assess student development. Teachers can conduct student assessment in a wide array of ways, from simple observations and teacher journals to standardized testing. During a research assignment, I found an article from Edutopia that provided a lot of insight on how teachers should view and interpret data. Rebecca Adler, in her article “Three Ways Student Data Can Inform Your Teaching,” argues that teachers should create a constructivist, student-directed classroom where teachers can collect data by simply having the opportunity to listen to their students think out loud and participate in a group or pair setting. Adler explains the importance of this dynamic by stating, “The beauty of having a constructivist classroom is that the kids are comfortable with you walking around and sitting with them in their groups - your ‘guide on the side’ role. In other words, they don’t freeze up when you step away from the podium or your regular spot by the whiteboard” (1). By being the fly on the wall, teachers can find out answers to very important literacy development questions, like “How well are they making sense of the content? Interacting with others? Are they struggling with a learning activity?”         



            In addition to the constructivist mindset, Adler also reminds teachers that summative assessment and standardized tests are not always the enemy. In fact, they are a necessary component to a student’s development. While standardized tests do not assess every aspect of a child, they can and should be used alongside other assessment data to determine student grouping and differentiation. According to Adler, Standardized test data reveals how students performed: advanced, proficient, basic, and below basic. This could help inform how teachers choose student groups, create seating charts, and differentiate for individuals” (3). If, for example, a teacher has a student who has historically scored below basic and exhibits other signs of a struggling reader, that teacher should consider placing the student at the front of the class so that she can easily provide extra support. Teachers can also use this data to place students in discrete, changeable groups.

            As a general educator, I have used both of these types of assessments, as well as project-based assessments and rubrics for essays. By using a variety of assessment, teachers can collect data that considers all aspects of a student.



Below is a screen shot of Adler’s Edutopia article and a rubric that I used to asses a recent creative writing project.


Comments